5 Reasons Not to Leap to ICD-11

In our previous post, we discussed reasons why moving directly to ICD-11 would be beneficial for the healthcare industry. However, there are organizations such as the Coalition for ICD-10 who think otherwise. The Coalition for ICD-10, which is composed of 22 coding societies, hospitals, health plans, and health IT vendors, is on the defense as people say that ICD-10 might be further delayed again.

This coalition, including Health IT Now Coalition, BlueCross BlueShield Association, and Roche Diagnostics Corporation, supports the upcoming ICD-10 implementation. It claims that the coding system would not be ready for this drastic leap to skip ICD-10 and move straight to ICD-11. The US version of ICD-10 was created after years of research, input, and modifications. With so much time spent in creating ICD-10, the coalition states that it could take up to 30 years for ICD-11 to come out.

According to ICD-10 supporters, some of the top reasons to stick with ICD-10 are:

  1. It has taken 16 years to create ICD-10 and would realistically take more than two years to implement ICD-11 also (contrasting the WHO that claims it would be implemented in 2017).
  2. ICD-11 is built on ICD-10 and benefits from the clinical knowledge and additional detail that have been incorporated into the ICD-10 version.
  3. Training and overall implementation would be more difficult and time-consuming for physicians if they didn’t already know ICD-10.
  4. The US needs immediate revisions and cannot wait for ICD-11 for any more of its health data to deteriorate.
  5. ICD-10 would not be too difficult to implement because every other major advanced country is already using it and it is now available in 42 languages.

 

 

Healthcare Recruiters International
Right Menu Icon